Progress, for whom?...

I truly believe that no one is against "progress”, because the word progress supposedly implies an “improvement" for the society that is changing. But, the big problem that the social-economical progress has it is related to how just some people can have access to that change, take advantage of it and be influenced in a positive way. On the other side there is a very expensive price of progress that some people have to pay, due to the fact that progress is not just measured in a monetary way it also can be measured in the amount of suffered lives, especially those lives that didn’t have the opportunity to take advantage from the progress.

As far as we are concerned Governments have been pushed progress on non educated people to obtain monetary gains and increase their economic development, but we just need to observe what is really happening; poor people is becoming more vulnerable and rich people is increasing their profitst at the expense of those disadvantaged population.

During the Victorian era in England this situation was not completely different from the situation that we are living in today’s world. The British considered themselves as the model of the civilized world. However, beneath the surface of this great empire laid millions of subjugated people. This unfair social and economical situation experienced among the poorest it is also very well depicted in “Oliver Twist”, a novel written by Charles Dickens in the XIX Century. The main character of this novel, Oliver Twist was a poor and an orphan child who also experienced the injustices of life paying the price of the British progress during the industrialization process.
From my personal point of view, I believe that Oliver's experiences demonstrate the legal silence and invisibility of the poor, because the main character also represents the typical stereotype of the poor. However, Dickens himself exhibits middle-class prejudice, because he reproduced through the story the worst anti-Semitic stereotypes in Fagin, the"old" and "villainous Jew” who abused of some children to obtein money. This is in itself another problematic in our contemporary society, as the inherent anti-Semitism which attaches to Dickens’ descriptions of him are difficult for the modern reader to dispassionately assimilate.
From my personal point of view, I believe that Oliver's experiences demonstrate the legal silence and invisibility of the poor, because the main character also represents the typical stereotype of the poor. However, Dickens himself exhibits middle-class prejudice, because he reproduced through the story the worst anti-Semitic stereotypes in Fagin, the"old" and "villainous Jew” who abused of some children to obtein money. This is in itself another problematic in our contemporary society, as the inherent anti-Semitism which attaches to Dickens’ descriptions of him are difficult for the modern reader to dispassionately assimilate.
To conclude, I think that we have to bear in mind the Universal Declaration of Human rights when we contemplate what is happening in our society and we cannot forget that this Declaration is not only concerned with civil and political rights but also with what are known as economic and social rights. Changes and progress for all societies should be always part of every single human being.




